JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)January 27, 2004

A- de 2004

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Rodrigo Escobar Gil

✓Claimant Esperanza Delgado Motoa

✓
Topic · hard data
Aclaracion Sentencia C-1017/03. Negada
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Corte Constitucional
  • Incompetencia para absolver consultas o realizar aclaraciones originadas en la interpretación de fallos
Sentencia De Constitucionalidad
  • Improcedencia de recursos y solicitudes de aclaración
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se negó por improcedente la solicitud de aclaración de la Sentencia C-1017/03, toda vez que el Art. 241 de la Constitución no asignó a la Corte funciones de órgano consultivo, por lo que no está dentro de su competencia absolver consultas o aclaraciones originadas en la interpretación de sus fallos.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (22 points)
  1. Primero. Negar por improcedente la solicitud de aclaración de la sentencia C-1017 de 2003.
  2. Segundo. Comuníquese la presente providencia al interesado.
  3. Cúmplase
  4. CLARA INÉS VARGAS HERNÁNDEZ
  5. Presidenta
  6. JAIME ARAUJO RENTERÍA
  7. Magistrado
  8. ALFREDO BELTRÁN SIERRA
  9. Magistrado
  10. MANUEL JOSÉ CEPEDA ESPINOSA
  11. Magistrado
  12. JAIME CÓRDOBA TRIVIÑO
  13. Magistrado
  14. RODRIGO ESCOBAR GIL
  15. Magistrado
  16. MARCO GERARDO MONROY CABRA
  17. Magistrado
  18. EDUARDO MONTEALEGRE LYNETT
  19. Magistrado
  20. ÁLVARO TAFUR GALVIS
  21. Magistrado
  22. IVAN HUMBERTO ESCRUCERIA MAYOLO
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data
✓
Rodrigo Escobar Gil
Reporting justice
✓
Alfredo Beltrán Sierra
Magistrado
✓
Alvaro Tafur Galvis
Magistrado
✓
Clara Ines Vargas Hernandez
Presidente
✓
Eduardo Montealegre Lynett
Magistrado
✓
Jaime Araujo Rentería
Magistrado
✓
Jaime Córdoba Triviño
Magistrado
✓
Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa
Magistrado
✓
Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra
Magistrado
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
← cites 3cited by 0 →A. 003A/04C-1017/03 — Presupuesto De Rentas Y Recursos De Capital. Ley De Apropiaciones Para La Vigencia Fiscal Del 1 De Enero Al 31 De Diciembre De 2003. Ajuste · cited 24 timesC-1017/032003A. 021/99 — Solicitud De Aclaracion De La Sentencia C-136/99 · cited 6 timesA. 021/991999A. 054/00 — Solicitud De Aclaracion De La Sentencia C-067 De 1999 · cited 3 timesA. 054/002000
constitutional review unification tutela
Cites3
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.